Post(s) tagged with "2.0 principles"

Geeks Need Advice: Umair Haque on The Great Divide

In a provocative post that starts with asking why is Silicon Valley so frightened of MySpace — principally because they accomplished what they have outside the normal SV mindset, he suggests, and in particular, because the valley is not wise to real consumer dynamics — Umair Haque asks a bigger question:

[from Industry Note - The Great Divide: Why is the Valley Afraid of MySpace?]

[…] why are these issues so difficult for the geeks to grapple with?

My answer: because for geeks, marketing, branding, advertising, etc are eeeeevil.

The challenge, of course, is for geeks to understand that it’s exactly this value equation they should be disrupting, not ignoring: making marketing, branding, advertising not evil.

That they’re evil doesn’t mean you should ignore them - it means you should be destroying them and then redefining them: making them less about Madison Ave and BuzzAgent, and more about the deep 2.0 principles that in fact, are revolutionizing the deep economics of many industries - principles like peer production, gift economies, sharing, transparency, social capital, anticonsumption, and deep culture.

Let me be a bit more blunt than I’d like to be: geeks (you too, VCs), this is your Next Big Thing - stop blowing it already.

Yes, exactly: Marketing 2.0, marketing rejiggered, taken out of the hands of the professional marketers, and reintegrated directly into the point and purpose of the things being built and sold.

This casts another light on the Advisory Capital meme: part of the pushback comes from the reframing the roles of various sorts of advisors who get various sorts of returns. Rethinking the deep structure of advice — both to those building products and to those using them — will run directly into the established marketing and venture worlds. In a more participatory culture, advisory capital will have greater intrinsic value.

And I hope that Umair expounds on that list in the weeks and months to come.

[Update: I started this post a few days ago, and hadn’t noticed until the minute after I hid the publish button that Umair has a post specifically on Advisory Capital where he states that he is one. He suggests that ACs are coming into being because of a VC competence gap. He then elaborates in a second post suggesting the world of VC need a radical rethink.

About

Web anthropologist, futurist, author. My focus is the future, and the tectonic forces pushing business, media, and society into an unclear and accelerating future. more.

Working on longer format projects, Sign up for the newsletter.

GigaOM Research analyst and curator.

Also writing beaconstreets.com.

Contact me. or ask me a question.



My Vizify profile.

Socialogy

  • John Hagel | John offers up some great insights, like the fact that passion is lower the larger that businesses get.

  • Euan Semple | A chat with my old pal, and the author of Organizations Don't Tweet, People Do

  • Will McInnes | The author of Culture Shock and managing director of Nixon/McInnes

  • Jennifer Magnolfi | An interview with the woman who said, 'Work is not a place you go, it's a thing you do'.

  • Hot Now

  • What Drives Us? | A draft chapter of my book, discussing motivations, Maslow's hierarchy, and fluidarity.

  • Socialogy: Interview With John Hagel | I Speak with Joh Hagel about the innovation at the edge.

  • Complex organisation arises from webs of interaction among causal factors | So, it turns out that DNA is, in fact, a great metaphor for business culture, but only after you realize that DNA is not a few hundred off-on switches, but instead a universe of unknowable complexities, that we can interact with, and understand at some abstract cartoonish level, but not control, and never fully comprehend.

  • Bitcoin May Be the Global Economy’s Last Safe Haven | Paul Ford

  • Innovators Get Better With Age | Companies make a mistake by relying too much on the innoations of the young, because Nobel laureats don't come into their prime until their 50s.

  • Oldie

  • Infodemics | 2009 | Passing incomplete or inaccurate information about some risk event can make people take actions that increase the damage of the event itself.