Post(s) tagged with "stowe boyd"

We must judge models on whether they are useful, and not condemn them simply for being imperfect.

Stowe Boyd

Trust your practice.

Stowe Boyd

We should aspire to fluidity in place of the modern era’s solidarity. So, postnormal progressive thought has to move past searching for the lost solidarity of the last century, and contrive social tools to allow us to build — connection by connection — a new fluidity together.

Stowe Boyd, Fluidity, Not Solidarity

A person who doesn’t think metaphors matter is half blind.

Stowe Boyd

We are living in the ruins of a economic/political system that treats the Earth as spoils of zero-sum conflict.

Stowe Boyd

My talk with Paul Greenberg at Pivot Conference on Leadership In The Social Business (or more apt, Leadership In The Postnormal).

First reblog since setting up Stowe Boyd as a Tumblr blog. The recent Books As Social Objects.

First reblog since setting up Stowe Boyd as a Tumblr blog. The recent Books As Social Objects.

Clarification: I Am Not A Blue Whale

Just to clarify my status, because so many people still are confused: I am not a partner in Blue Whale Labs. I parted amicably for the company in February, and my former partners, Greg Narain and Ranvir Gujral, continue to grow the company as a Ruby development shop.

I guess our tiny marketing campaign for the company must have been effective, since people continue to associate me with the firm, even six months after I have left.

Since February, I have returned to independent consulting. Check out www.stoweboyd.com/work, where I write from time to time about my consulting and clients.

I am doing business as /Message, where I tell people my title is /Messenger.

Whenever you have truth it must be given with love, or the message and the messenger will be rejected. — Gandhi

Join us at mesh

Mark your calendars for the upcoming (and rescheduled) mesh — Canada’s web 2.0 conference - Toronto May 15 & 16. mesh will bring together great keynotes and speakers, including Om Malik, Paul Kedrosky, Andrew Coyne, Michael Geist, Tara Hunt, Paul Wells, Steve Rubel, Jason Fried, Stowe Boyd (yes, me), Amber McArthur, Ren Bucholz, Andrew Baron, Chris Messina, David Crow (whew!) and many others. Organizers include Rob Hyndman, Matthew Ingram, Mike McDerment, Stuart MacDonald, and Mark Evans.

Looks like a great conference, and a great venue. Toronto is a fabulous city.

[Long aside: I truly love Canada: even before my sister moved there and became a ‘landed’ immigrant after living in Toronto 20-odd years, I had traveled much of the country. In the past few decades, I have been to the country literally a hundred times or so, and I am increasingly enamored of this very foreign country so close by. I also hope that if I continue to say nice things, I will be allowed to emigrate, which looks like a better and better idea considering America’s political situation and progressive global warming. Although Toronto may be one day be under water as the Great Lakes slowly turn into a giant inland ocean.

MarketingMonger Podcast #3: Interview with Stowe Boyd

I was interviewed yesterday (via telephone from Stockholm) by Eric Mattson of MarketingMonger, a guy who plans to interview 1000 people in what is likely to be a multi-year project:

[from The Blog Post That Launched One Thousand Podcasts]

So…taking a page from Greek Mythology, with this post I’m launching a project to conduct ONE THOUSAND podcast interviews of marketers, bloggers, authors, designers, entrepreneurs, and social media innovators.

I’m sure you have questions. Since I can guess at some here are my current answers.

Why do this?

I believe that social media is still in its infancy. Podcasting, tagging, blogging, gaming, social networking and similar trends have only just begun to affect our lives and marketing. In order to understand the changes, I believe that one must participate.

Why one thousand interviews?

I chose 1,000 because 100 seemed too easy and 10,000 seemed too big. A thousand interviews seems like a good “stretch” goal.

Why focus on marketing and social media?

Because that’s what I’m interested in. And if I’m going to talk about something for, hmmm, let’s see, 30 minutes x 1,000 interviews, carry the 2, roughly 500 hours, I want it to be interesting to me.

How long will it take?

I don’t know. A couple of years.

What do you hope to get out of this?

A better understanding of how social media is changing marketing. A chance to talk with interesting people. A better professional network. A chance to share all of that with the community. Maybe, BIG MAYBE, some consulting gigs or some sponsorship.

How can I help?

I’m glad you asked. Here’s my current thinking.

Subscribe - You can either simply subscribe to my blog’s RSS feed or to the podcast feed. If you need help, Apple explains how to use iTunes to subscribe or you can google it.

Participate - In order to conduct one thousand interviews, I need you. I will be proactively seeking out people to interview based on news and blogs and such but I’d love a willing victim or two. If you want to participate, you need to 30 minutes or so, a phone (landline prefered) and something marketing-related that you’re passionate about and want to talk about. Email me if you’re interested.

Advise Me - I’m relatively new to podcasting. As this project continues, I will be continually improving the podcasts that I make. If you know more than I do and want to give me some advice, I would love it. Just email me.

Support - Life costs money. But the podcasts I’m making will be free. Eventually, I may set up a tip jar for personal donations. But if your company might want to sponsor the project with cash and/or donations of services (castingWords, are you listening?), drop me an email. If nothing else, I like link love.

Have questions? Email me or post comments. The project is a work in progress.

Wild. I like a guy with big dreams. But since he is only on interview #3, he has a long way to go.

Here’s the podcast, although I think his story is more interesting than this interview: MarketingMonger: MarketingMonger Podcast #3: Interview with Stowe Boyd.

About

Web anthropologist, futurist, author. My focus is the future, and the tectonic forces pushing business, media, and society into an unclear and accelerating future. (More.)

Working on longer format projects, Sign up for the newsletter.

GigaOM Research analyst and curator.



Also writing beaconstreets.com.

Contact me. or ask me a question.



My Vizify profile.

Socialogy

  • Brian Solis | Brian and I debunk big data, and Brian makes the case for empathy.

  • Deb Lavoy | Deb is dubious about management's inclinations, and says, 'Just because you are networked doesn’t mean it necessarily helps you understand, or realize your needs more effectively.'

  • John Hagel | John offers up some great insights, like the fact that passion is lower the larger that businesses get.

  • Euan Semple | A chat with my old pal, and the author of Organizations Don't Tweet, People Do

  • Will McInnes | The author of Culture Shock and managing director of Nixon/McInnes

  • Jennifer Magnolfi | An interview with the woman who said, 'Work is not a place you go, it's a thing you do'.

  • Hot Now

  • What Drives Us? | A draft chapter of my book, discussing motivations, Maslow's hierarchy, and fluidarity.

  • Socialogy: Interview With John Hagel | I Speak with Joh Hagel about the innovation at the edge.

  • Complex organisation arises from webs of interaction among causal factors | So, it turns out that DNA is, in fact, a great metaphor for business culture, but only after you realize that DNA is not a few hundred off-on switches, but instead a universe of unknowable complexities, that we can interact with, and understand at some abstract cartoonish level, but not control, and never fully comprehend.

  • Bitcoin May Be the Global Economy’s Last Safe Haven | Paul Ford

  • Innovators Get Better With Age | Companies make a mistake by relying too much on the innoations of the young, because Nobel laureats don't come into their prime until their 50s.

  • Oldie

  • Infodemics | 2009 | Passing incomplete or inaccurate information about some risk event can make people take actions that increase the damage of the event itself.