Post(s) tagged with "new york"

I was talking to a woman who had moved here from California. “If the whole world comes to New York when they need to leave home and discover something new, where do New Yorkers go?”

“The movies,” I said.

word up

Source: telia

I don’t like New York. I just think it’s the best place for my business.

Josh Miller,  describing why he moved Branch to NYC after a brief time in San Francisco, cited by Joshua Brustein, in For Tech Start-Ups, New York Has Increasing Allure via  NYTimes.com

The New York Times

Census Estimates for 2011 Show Population Growth in New York - Sam Roberts via NYTimes.com ⇢

New York is growing faster than projected, a combination of increased immigration, higher birthrates, and decreased emigration.

Sam Roberts via NYTimes.com

New York City gained nearly 70,000 residents in the 15 months ended July 1, 2011, almost matching the growth of the 1990s, when an influx of foreigners set annual records, according to census estimates released on Wednesday.

[…]

In the estimates by the Census Bureau for July 1, 2011, the biggest gains were recorded in Brooklyn and Queens. Brooklyn had gained nearly 28,000 people since April 1, 2010, and Queens had gained more than 17,000.

Those gains, combined with increases in every other borough, boosted the city’s population by 69,777, to 8,244,910.

Remember that Brooklyn is an area with growing numbers of Hispanic and Asian immigrants, Hasidic Jews, and the largest concentration of ‘artists’ in the history of the world.

Also keep in mind that they faster that humanity crams itself into cities, the better for the environment, as well as for human social innovation. So the increase in New York and other US cities is largely a move in the right direction (although the US southwest has a long term water problem).

According to the Center for an Urban Future, “freelance businesses has been a faster growing part of the Brooklyn economy than employer-based businesses”. The BEDC reported that the number of creative self-employed persons in Brooklyn grew at five times the rate of Manhattan over the 2002-2005 period. Brooklyn now has 22,000 creative self-employed workers. More than 70% are independent artists, writers, photogrpahers, jewewly makers, designers - making Brooklyn’s “creative crescent”, a cluster of waterfront neighborhoods stretching from Greenpoint in the north to Red Hook in the south, the largest concentration of artists in the history of the world.

Anthony Townsend, Art as Personal Business in the City: Brooklyn’s Creative Freelance Economy via IFTF’s Future Now

Source: future.iftf.org

New York Now Allows Benefit Corporations

New York has passed legislation to allow the formation of a new sort of corporation — a Benefit Corporation, or B Corp:

Kyle Westaway, New Legal Structures for ‘Social Entrepreneurs’

 The Benefit Corporation is a new class of corporation with a corporate purpose to create public benefit, a broader fiduciary duty and is transparent about its overall social and environmental performance.

By definition, it must operate for the general public benefit – defined as a material positive impact on society and the environment. Every benefit corporation is required to publish an assessment using an independent, third-party assessment tool. To create a material positive benefit, a benefit corporation operates in a manner that not only creates value for the company’s shareholders, but also its community, environment, employees and suppliers.

The structure also calls for a high level of transparency and accountability. Within 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, a benefit corporation is required to publish a “Benefit Report,” which states how it performed that year on a social and environmental axis.

The press release, received by email:

NY Law Creates New Kind of Corporation

Spurs Investment to Create High Quality Jobs and

Use Business to Solve Social Problems

State Legislators from Wall Street Sponsored the Bill

Albany, NY: At midnight last night a law was enacted creating benefit corporations, a new class of corporations required to create benefit for society as well as shareholders.  Unlike traditional corporations, benefit corporations are required to create a material positive impact on society and the environment; consider how decisions affect employees, community and the environment; and publicly report their social and environmental performance using established third-party standards. 

Continuing a national trend of strong bi-partisan support for benefit corporation legislation, the New York bill (S79-A and A4692-A), sponsored by Senators Daniel Squadron (D-25) and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver (D-64) and co-sponsored by William Larkin (R, C-39), passed both houses of the New York legislature unanimously.

“Political leaders like Speaker Silver, and Senators Squadron and Larkin understand that New York needs to attract businesses whose core purpose is to create more high quality jobs and to improve the quality of life in communities across the state,” said Andrew Kassoy, co founder of B Lab, the nonprofit organization that drafted the model legislation.  “The benefit corporation bill will unlock billions of dollars in impact investment capital and enable entrepreneurs across the state to start businesses that solve some of society’s greatest challenges.”

“Benefit corporations will mean New York is open for business in an important new way. Benefit corporations will unlock billions of dollars in new investments in New York while empowering companies to do well and do good,” said Senator Squadron. “By offering this opportunity to entrepreneurs and investors, New York will bring new businesses into the state, new investors into the market and a new socially-minded approach for our entrepreneurs.”

“By bringing benefit corporations to New York, we are showing that profit and social responsibility are not mutually exclusive,” said Speaker Silver.  “This law will continue our efforts to strengthen and diversify our economy while ensuring that New York remains a national leader in progressive policies that help our environment, protect consumers and bolster the rights of working men and women.”

“I am very happy to see that this bill has finally become law.  It will enable businesses to grow without the infringement of state government, and will help New York become a more business friendly state,” added Senator Larkin.

The new law addresses a long time concern among entrepreneurs who need to raise growth capital but fear losing control of the social or environmental mission of their business. These entrepreneurs and other shareholders of benefit corporations now have additional rights to hold directors accountable for failure to create a material positive impact on society, to consider the impact of decisions on employees, community, and the environment, or to inform the public about the company’s overall social and environmental impact as assessed against a credible, independent third party standard.

New York is the seventh state to pass benefit corporation legislation, joining Maryland, Vermont, New Jersey, Virginia, Hawaii, and most recently, California.  The legislation has enjoyed broad bi-partisan support nationally, with a vote tally of 892 ayes and 62 nays, and the signatures of both Republican and Democratic governors. The New York bill had significant support from business (partial list below), including Eileen Fisher, City Light Capital, and UncommonGoods; and from more than 2,600 New York citizens, all interested in creating better choices for the growing number of entrepreneurs and investors who seek to create businesses that create both social and shareholder value.

“The passage of benefit corporation legislation is an important and much needed step forward to grow our New York state economy and create more jobs which can also provide greater social and environmental benefit,” says David Levine, co-founder of the American Sustainable Business Council whose members’ organizations represent over 100,000 businesses. “At a time when the country is looking for solutions to build the economy, New York is helping to lead the way with an innovative and sustainable business strategy.”

I am going to be actively looking for B corps in New York, and finding out why their founders opted for that path.

The City that is a Goal

bobulate

E.B. White outlines that there are roughly three New Yorks:

1) The New York of the man or woman who was born here
2) The New York of the commuter
3) The New York of the person who was born somewhere else and came to New York in quest of something

On the third:

[T]he greatest is the last — the city of final destination, the city that is a goal. It is this third city that accounts for New York’s high-strung disposition, its poetical deportment, its dedication to the arts, and its incomparable achievements. Commuters give the city its tidal restlessness; natives give it solidity and continuity; but the settlers give it passion. And whether it is a farmer arriving from Italy to set up a small grocery store in a slum, or a young girl arriving from a small town in Mississippi to escape the indignity of being observed by her neighbors, or a boy arriving from the Corn Belt with a manuscript in his suitcase and a pain in his heart, it makes no difference: each embraces New York with the intense excitement of first love, each absorbs New York with the fresh eyes of an adventurer, each generates heat and light to dwarf the Consolidated Edison Company.

I returned to visit the place I grew up this weekend to take a trip with my family. “Home” is how I’d referred to the place for years. Yet slowly there was that tension between the place you lived and the place you live, the “were” and the “is,” the past, the present, and perhaps the future. And “home” — a four-letter word of a different kind — transforms.

More than a decade ago, I arrived in New York, but never intended to stay. I might (if I may), say then there are roughly four New Yorks:

Fourth, there is the New York of the man or woman who was born somewhere else and came to New York never intending to stay. Of these four incomparable cities, it may be the fourth that is the most unflappable, the most infallible, the most loyal. You see it is she who has understood love of a city, of its natives, and its commuters, of its messy seams and its buttoned-up asphalt, of its uptown arts and its devoted downtown. And she’s been spat on and praised, she’s been carried home, and cheered on. It is she, who embraces the city, knowing she had a choice otherwise. Yet her goal is to make this her home.

In 2010, Silicon Valley accounted for the lion’s share of venture-capital investment by far: $9.1 billion, or about 40 percent of the total. New England, with its high-tech complex running from Cambridge and Boston to the surrounding Route 128 area, was second with $2.6 billion, 11 percent of the total. New York, with its newly ascendant Silicon Alley, was third, with roughly $2 billion, or 8.6 percent. The Southeast states — mainly North Carolina but also Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi, and Alabama — attracted $1.2 billion (5.1 percent) mainly concentrated in biotech, software, telecom, and media. Texas accounted for close to another billion ($942 million), or 4.1 percent with its investments mainly focussed on energy as well as software, media, and semiconductors. And while the level of venture investment in the South-Central states (including Oklahoma, Arkansas, Kansas, and Louisiana) remains low relatively speaking, the region saw a staggering 540-percent growth between 2005 and 2010, the largest increase across any region of the country by far. Overall, roughly one in ten of the nation’s venture investment dollars are spent in the South.

- Richard Florida, The Spread of Start-Up America and the Rise of the High-Tech South

Florida is making a super weak argument here. The entire south — southeast and south-central states, and Texas — collectively raised about $2B in venture in 2010, which is the same as New York City.

Besides, innovation culture is an emergent property of cities, not broad geographic regions. Would be much more useful to see this broken out by cities, where I am sure that the Geoffrey West superlinearity equation — Y(0) = N0Y(t)B — would predict that a city of 2 million will get 1.15 times as much as a city of one million, on average, because B ≈ 1.15.

Source: The Atlantic

Tune in on The Future of Work session broadcasting live from New York on Thursday at 7pm EST | Podio Blog ⇢

You don’t have to be in New York to know and discuss the future of work. We will be live streaming the event and would love for you to join us. Just save this link http://www.livestream.com/podio and click it on Thursday 7pm EST to watch the session.

Stowe Boyd is joining the Podio World Tour. He is known for his writing and pioneering work around social tools and their impact on media, business, and society.

The event is part of the Podio World Tour: The Future of Work and we are happy to have Stowe Boyd joining us for the US part. Together we visit major cities and invite some of the most insightful folks for an open conversation about the future of work. In New York on Thursday Stowe will be accompanied by Valeria Maltoni, Marcia Conner, and Jennifer Magnolfi and you can take part and ask questions via chat or twitter too, it’s at 7pm EST here http://www.livestream.com/podio read more about the event here.

Just got off a Skype call with Jon Froda of Podio about the Future of Work talk tomorrow, which will be livestreamed.

If you are trying to attend in person, we are space-constrained, so sign up ASAP.

Tech investments in N.Y. top Mass. - Boston.com ⇢

New data shows what we have been seeing at a grassroots level: NYC is surpassing Boston at the second largest tech scene in the US, especially when you discount the biotech area:

The data being released today by New York investment research firm CB Insights show that New York has had 261 technology deals over the last six quarters, versus 250 for Massachusetts. New York tech companies received investments worth a combined $1.6 billion. Massachusetts companies got $1.4 billion in the same period. Both are behind California’s Silicon Valley, which has a firm grip on the number one position by a wide margin.

New York’s growth is fueled by the kind of technology start-ups that venture capitalists currently find attractive: digital media and advertising companies, which build on Manhattan’s base of older-technology firms in the same fields.

“There’s no disputing that New York is on fire now. It’s a very hot market,’’ said Michael A. Gree ley, general partner at Flybridge Capital Partners in Boston and past chairman of the New England Venture Capital Association. “Massachusetts investors now have a new respect for Manhattan.’’

The first indication that New York was challenging Massachusetts came at the beginning of this year, as the venture capital industry was starting to process investment data from 2010. On the eve of releasing last year’s venture capital investment numbers, CB Insights posted a preview of a “trend that caught our eye.’’

In the area of Internet technology, “N.Y. is starting to credibly close the gap between itself and its northern brother, Massachusetts,’’ the firm stated.

Massachusetts still beats New York by a significant margin in total venture funds invested, CB Insights acknowledged. New York has very few life sciences start-ups, for example. That sector generally demands significant investments from venture capitalists. Life sciences start-ups in Massachusetts attract millions of dollars in investment every quarter.

But in hot investment sectors such as the Internet, mobile technology, and social media, New York really had caught up to Massachusetts.

“Sentiment is very bullish in New York right now,’’ said Anand Sanwal, cofounder of CB Insights, “so we thought it was worth noting.’’


Steven Johnson, What A Hundred Million Calls To 311 Reveal About New York
New Yorkers are accustomed to strong odors, but several years ago a new aroma  began wafting through the city’s streets, a smell that was more  unnerving than the usual offenders (trash, sweat, urine) precisely  because it was so delightful: the sweet, unmistakable scent of maple  syrup. It was a fickle miasma, though, draping itself over Morningside  Heights one afternoon, disappearing for weeks, reemerging in Chelsea for  a few passing hours before vanishing again. Fearing a chemical warfare  attack, perhaps from the Aunt Jemima wing of al Qaeda, hundreds of New  Yorkers reported the smell to authorities. The New York Times first wrote about it in October 2005; local blogs covered each outbreak,  augmented by firsthand reports in their comment threads.
The city quickly determined that the odor was harmless, but the mystery of its origin persisted for four years. During maple syrup events, as  they came to be called, operators at the city’s popular NYC311 call  center—set up to field complaints and provide information on school  closings and the like—were instructed to reassure callers that they  could go about their business as usual.
But then city officials had an idea. Those calls into the 311 line,  they realized, weren’t simply queries from an edgy populace. They were  clues.
On January 29, 2009, another maple syrup event commenced in northern  Manhattan. The first reports triggered a new protocol that routed all  complaints to the Office of Emergency Management and Department of  Environmental Protection, which took precise location data from each  syrup smeller. Within hours, inspectors were taking air quality samples  in the affected regions. The reports were tagged by location and mapped  against previous complaints. A working group gathered atmospheric data  from past syrup events: temperature, humidity, wind direction, velocity.
Seen all together, the data formed a giant arrow aiming at a group of  industrial plants in northeastern New Jersey. A quick bit of  shoe-leather detective work led the authorities to a flavor compound  manufacturer named Frutarom, which had been processing fenugreek seeds  on January 29. Fenugreek is a versatile spice used in many cuisines  around the world, but in American supermarkets, it’s most commonly found  in the products on one shelf—the one where they sell cheap maple-syrup  substitutes.

This piece reminds me of the fantastic presentation Paul Kedrosky gave at Defrag a few weeks back on his ‘Ladder Index’ — the frequency of ladders found on southern California’s highways — as a leading indicator of the housing market.
Big data is everywhere, and can be tapped in mysterious — and smelly — ways.

Steven Johnson, What A Hundred Million Calls To 311 Reveal About New York

New Yorkers are accustomed to strong odors, but several years ago a new aroma began wafting through the city’s streets, a smell that was more unnerving than the usual offenders (trash, sweat, urine) precisely because it was so delightful: the sweet, unmistakable scent of maple syrup. It was a fickle miasma, though, draping itself over Morningside Heights one afternoon, disappearing for weeks, reemerging in Chelsea for a few passing hours before vanishing again. Fearing a chemical warfare attack, perhaps from the Aunt Jemima wing of al Qaeda, hundreds of New Yorkers reported the smell to authorities. The New York Times first wrote about it in October 2005; local blogs covered each outbreak, augmented by firsthand reports in their comment threads.

The city quickly determined that the odor was harmless, but the mystery of its origin persisted for four years. During maple syrup events, as they came to be called, operators at the city’s popular NYC311 call center—set up to field complaints and provide information on school closings and the like—were instructed to reassure callers that they could go about their business as usual.

But then city officials had an idea. Those calls into the 311 line, they realized, weren’t simply queries from an edgy populace. They were clues.

On January 29, 2009, another maple syrup event commenced in northern Manhattan. The first reports triggered a new protocol that routed all complaints to the Office of Emergency Management and Department of Environmental Protection, which took precise location data from each syrup smeller. Within hours, inspectors were taking air quality samples in the affected regions. The reports were tagged by location and mapped against previous complaints. A working group gathered atmospheric data from past syrup events: temperature, humidity, wind direction, velocity.

Seen all together, the data formed a giant arrow aiming at a group of industrial plants in northeastern New Jersey. A quick bit of shoe-leather detective work led the authorities to a flavor compound manufacturer named Frutarom, which had been processing fenugreek seeds on January 29. Fenugreek is a versatile spice used in many cuisines around the world, but in American supermarkets, it’s most commonly found in the products on one shelf—the one where they sell cheap maple-syrup substitutes.

This piece reminds me of the fantastic presentation Paul Kedrosky gave at Defrag a few weeks back on his ‘Ladder Index’ — the frequency of ladders found on southern California’s highways — as a leading indicator of the housing market.

Big data is everywhere, and can be tapped in mysterious — and smelly — ways.

About

Web anthropologist, futurist, author. My focus is the future, and the tectonic forces pushing business, media, and society into an unclear and accelerating future. more.

Working on longer format projects, Sign up for the newsletter.

GigaOM Research analyst and curator.

Also writing beaconstreets.com.

Contact me. or ask me a question.



My Vizify profile.

Socialogy

  • John Hagel | John offers up some great insights, like the fact that passion is lower the larger that businesses get.

  • Euan Semple | A chat with my old pal, and the author of Organizations Don't Tweet, People Do

  • Will McInnes | The author of Culture Shock and managing director of Nixon/McInnes

  • Jennifer Magnolfi | An interview with the woman who said, 'Work is not a place you go, it's a thing you do'.

  • Hot Now

  • What Drives Us? | A draft chapter of my book, discussing motivations, Maslow's hierarchy, and fluidarity.

  • Socialogy: Interview With John Hagel | I Speak with Joh Hagel about the innovation at the edge.

  • Complex organisation arises from webs of interaction among causal factors | So, it turns out that DNA is, in fact, a great metaphor for business culture, but only after you realize that DNA is not a few hundred off-on switches, but instead a universe of unknowable complexities, that we can interact with, and understand at some abstract cartoonish level, but not control, and never fully comprehend.

  • Bitcoin May Be the Global Economy’s Last Safe Haven | Paul Ford

  • Innovators Get Better With Age | Companies make a mistake by relying too much on the innoations of the young, because Nobel laureats don't come into their prime until their 50s.

  • Oldie

  • Infodemics | 2009 | Passing incomplete or inaccurate information about some risk event can make people take actions that increase the damage of the event itself.