Post(s) tagged with "drones"

James Bridle on the Canon Drone

James Bridle was artist in residence for the Visible Futures lab at the School of Visual Arts, and is interested in all things drone. He looked into the most widely seen image for drone (#1 result on Google searches) and determined that its a photoshop job:

from One Visible Future

The Canon Drone does not exist, it never has. It is computer generated rendering of a drone, a fiction. It flies over an abstracted landscape - although perhaps the same one as another canonical image, thisPredator in flight, which, while unmarked, at least appears worn enough to be believable.

Where does the image originate? As the default drone photo, it is endlessly reproduced without attribution. It appears in Google Image searches for 2009, but not for 2008 - although I’m unsure how reliable this dating is. I’ve hit a wall in finding out more.

I think: the Canon Drone is emblematic of the liminal, self-obfuscating essence of the UAV, and all of our noumenal infrastructures. The most widely reproduced image of this most illegible of our contemporary technologies is itself a dream.

The Internet Of Drones

John Robb thinks the next big thing is an internet of drones. And he doesn’t mean the government’s killing machines, but something more like what the US Postal Service should morph into:

DRONENET The Next BIG thing, John Robb

It’s a system that will explode in a way that is very similar to the way the Internet grew up — where connections were bought by individuals and installed one modem and IP address at a time, and where the early providers are local geeks with shelves full of modems and an expensive T-1 lines.   

It’s an approach that uses “uncontrolled airspace” and incremental purchases of cheap, standards compliant pads/drones to roll itself out (very similar to the way the Internet was able to piggy back on the old telephone system).  

As a result of this open approach and decentralization, it’s something that could grow VERY fast.

Here’s a simplified version of what I’m talking about:

  1. I put package onto a landing pad at my home.
  2. Drone arrives, takes package and flies away.
  3. Drone delivers package to landing pad at delivery location.

There’s almost nothing technically in the way of this happening right now.  

Here’s how it would work in practice:

  • My brother left his iphone at my house.  I want to get it to him, but he lives 30 mi away (as the crow flies, 50 by driving).
  • I put it into a delivery container and put it on a small landing pad outside my home.
  • I order a drone on my phone and put the ID of the container into the order (I could just as easily use a drone I buy to do it P2P).  
  • A drone arrives 10 minutes later, picks up the container automatically.
  • After a couple of hops, it arrives at my brother’s landing pad, where it drops off the container and alerts him with an e-mail/text.
  • Costs?  Probably less than $0.25 per 10 mi. or so.   So, about $0.75 in this instance.  Time?  An hour or so.  

Pizza delivery? Bottle of wine? How about groceries? 

I saw an announcement about Aeros recently, building lighter than air cargo solutions. Why can’t they be controlled as drones, too?

Source: globalguerrillas.typepad.com


TacoCopter and the Imminent Age of Drones - Dyland Hendricks via Institute For The Future
We’re at the ground floor of the Drone Age.
That was the message from Star Simpson, who stopped by the Institute yesterday to talk about TacoCopter, her in-joke turned viral juggernaut. The idea behind TacoCopter is relatively simple, but irresistibly futuristic: order tacos from your smartphone, and your friendly neighborhood unmanned drone will deliver them to your exact GPS coordinates within minutes. Star created tacocopter.com in 2011 as a joke to a friend, then promptly moved on to other projects. It wasn’t until March of 2012 that the popular blog Hacker News discovered her site, at which point every 21st century media outlet jumped onto the story of the business that would change restaurants forever. It didn’t seem to matter whether TacoCopter was real or not - it was an idea whose time had come.

via futuramb:

TacoCopter and the Imminent Age of Drones - Dyland Hendricks via Institute For The Future

We’re at the ground floor of the Drone Age.

That was the message from Star Simpson, who stopped by the Institute yesterday to talk about TacoCopter, her in-joke turned viral juggernaut. The idea behind TacoCopter is relatively simple, but irresistibly futuristic: order tacos from your smartphone, and your friendly neighborhood unmanned drone will deliver them to your exact GPS coordinates within minutes. Star created tacocopter.com in 2011 as a joke to a friend, then promptly moved on to other projects. It wasn’t until March of 2012 that the popular blog Hacker News discovered her site, at which point every 21st century media outlet jumped onto the story of the business that would change restaurants forever. It didn’t seem to matter whether TacoCopter was real or not - it was an idea whose time had come.

via futuramb:

Source: iftf.org

edgur:

vaginafor1000alex:

lovethyhippie:

lost-and-searching-in-america:

Is this a mosquito? No. It’s an insect spy drone for urban areas, already in production, funded by the US Government. It can be remotely controlled and is equipped with a camera and a microphone. It can land on you, and it may have the potential to take a DNA sample or leave RFID tracking nanotechnology on your skin. SourceActual research paperActual footageAnother sourceAnd another

edgur:

vaginafor1000alex:

lovethyhippie:

lost-and-searching-in-america:

Is this a mosquito? No. It’s an insect spy drone for urban areas, already in production, funded by the US Government. It can be remotely controlled and is equipped with a camera and a microphone. It can land on you, and it may have the potential to take a DNA sample or leave RFID tracking nanotechnology on your skin. 
Source
Actual research paper
Actual footage
Another source
And another

Source: the-flame-imperishable

Unmanned and computer-controlled drones, with no ‘man in the loop’?

William Hennigan via LA Times
The X-47B is an experimental jet — that’s what the X stands for — and is  designed to demonstrate new technology, such as automated takeoffs,  landings and refueling. The drone also has a fully capable weapons bay  with a payload capacity of 4,500 pounds, but the Navy said it has no  plans to arm it. The Navy is now testing two of the aircraft, which were built behind razor-wire fences at Northrop Grumman Corp.’s expansive complex in Palmdale, where the company manufactured the B-2 stealth bomber. Funded under a $635.8-million contract awarded by the Navy in 2007, the  X-47B Unmanned Combat Air System Carrier Demonstration program has grown  in cost to an estimated $813 million. Last February, the first X-47B had its maiden flight from Edwards Air  Force Base, where it continued testing until last month when it was  carried from the Mojave Desert to Naval Air Station Patuxent River in  southern Maryland. It is there that the next stage of the demonstration  program begins. The drone is slated to first land on a carrier by 2013, relying on  pinpoint GPS coordinates and advanced avionics. The carrier’s computers  digitally transmit the carrier’s speed, cross-winds and other data to  the drone as it approaches from miles away. The X-47B will not only land itself, but will also  know what kind of  weapons it is carrying, when and where it needs to refuel with an aerial  tanker, and  whether there’s a nearby threat, said Carl Johnson,  Northrop’s X-47B program manager. “It will do its own math and decide  what it should do next.”

As Dashiell Bennett observes, doing its ‘own math’ raises many questions:

It [X-47B] could also revolutionize military and international law, as leaders  must decide if they can authorize machines to make “lethal combat  decisions” — and if anyone back home can be held be responsible when  they do. We all saw the Terminator movies, so we know that usually turns  out.

Unmanned and computer-controlled drones, with no ‘man in the loop’?

William Hennigan via LA Times

The X-47B is an experimental jet — that’s what the X stands for — and is designed to demonstrate new technology, such as automated takeoffs, landings and refueling. The drone also has a fully capable weapons bay with a payload capacity of 4,500 pounds, but the Navy said it has no plans to arm it.

The Navy is now testing two of the aircraft, which were built behind razor-wire fences at Northrop Grumman Corp.’s expansive complex in Palmdale, where the company manufactured the B-2 stealth bomber.

Funded under a $635.8-million contract awarded by the Navy in 2007, the X-47B Unmanned Combat Air System Carrier Demonstration program has grown in cost to an estimated $813 million.

Last February, the first X-47B had its maiden flight from Edwards Air Force Base, where it continued testing until last month when it was carried from the Mojave Desert to Naval Air Station Patuxent River in southern Maryland. It is there that the next stage of the demonstration program begins.

The drone is slated to first land on a carrier by 2013, relying on pinpoint GPS coordinates and advanced avionics. The carrier’s computers digitally transmit the carrier’s speed, cross-winds and other data to the drone as it approaches from miles away.

The X-47B will not only land itself, but will also know what kind of weapons it is carrying, when and where it needs to refuel with an aerial tanker, and whether there’s a nearby threat, said Carl Johnson, Northrop’s X-47B program manager. “It will do its own math and decide what it should do next.”

As Dashiell Bennett observes, doing its ‘own math’ raises many questions:

It [X-47B] could also revolutionize military and international law, as leaders must decide if they can authorize machines to make “lethal combat decisions” — and if anyone back home can be held be responsible when they do. We all saw the Terminator movies, so we know that usually turns out.

Los Angeles Times

About

Web anthropologist, futurist, author. My focus is the future, and the tectonic forces pushing business, media, and society into an unclear and accelerating future. more.

Working on longer format projects, Sign up for the newsletter.

GigaOM Research analyst and curator.

Also writing beaconstreets.com.

Contact me. or ask me a question.



My Vizify profile.

Socialogy

  • John Hagel | John offers up some great insights, like the fact that passion is lower the larger that businesses get.

  • Euan Semple | A chat with my old pal, and the author of Organizations Don't Tweet, People Do

  • Will McInnes | The author of Culture Shock and managing director of Nixon/McInnes

  • Jennifer Magnolfi | An interview with the woman who said, 'Work is not a place you go, it's a thing you do'.

  • Hot Now

  • What Drives Us? | A draft chapter of my book, discussing motivations, Maslow's hierarchy, and fluidarity.

  • Socialogy: Interview With John Hagel | I Speak with Joh Hagel about the innovation at the edge.

  • Complex organisation arises from webs of interaction among causal factors | So, it turns out that DNA is, in fact, a great metaphor for business culture, but only after you realize that DNA is not a few hundred off-on switches, but instead a universe of unknowable complexities, that we can interact with, and understand at some abstract cartoonish level, but not control, and never fully comprehend.

  • Bitcoin May Be the Global Economy’s Last Safe Haven | Paul Ford

  • Innovators Get Better With Age | Companies make a mistake by relying too much on the innoations of the young, because Nobel laureats don't come into their prime until their 50s.

  • Oldie

  • Infodemics | 2009 | Passing incomplete or inaccurate information about some risk event can make people take actions that increase the damage of the event itself.