The extraordinary success of Homo sapiens is a result of four things: intelligence, language, an ability to manipulate objects dexterously in order to make tools, and co-operation. Over the decades the anthropological spotlight has shifted from one to another of these as the prime mover of the package, and thus the fundament of the human condition. At the moment co-operation is the most fashionable subject of investigation. In particular, why are humans so willing to collaborate with unrelated strangers, even to the point of risking being cheated by people whose characters they cannot possibly know? Evidence from economic games played in the laboratory for real money suggests humans are both trusting of those they have no reason to expect they will ever see again, and surprisingly unwilling to cheat them—and that these phenomena are deeply ingrained in the species’s psychology. Existing theories of the evolution of trust depend either on the participants being relatives (and thus sharing genes) or on their relationship being long-term, with each keeping count to make sure the overall benefits of collaboration exceed the costs. Neither applies in the case of passing strangers, and that has led to speculation that something extraordinary, such as a need for extreme collaboration prompted by the emergence of warfare that uses weapons, has happened in recent human evolution to promote the emergence of an instinct for unconditional generosity.

The evolution of generosity: Welcome, stranger | The Economist

(via wildcat2030)

Source: economist.com

6 September 2011 50 underpaidgenius
collaborationcooperation

Notes

  1. johntropea reblogged this from stoweboyd
  2. foureverakidatheart reblogged this from somechickindetroit
  3. somechickindetroit reblogged this from emergentfutures
  4. trevorloy reblogged this from smarterplanet
  5. isocher reblogged this from emergentfutures
  6. rio22 reblogged this from emergentfutures
  7. nikki-kodak reblogged this from emergentfutures
  8. super-novah reblogged this from emergentfutures
  9. emergentfutures reblogged this from smarterplanet
  10. polledemaagt reblogged this from stoweboyd
  11. thepenultimateindeed reblogged this from stoweboyd
  12. xklusiv reblogged this from smarterplanet
  13. domesday reblogged this from stoweboyd
  14. sdhzhsky reblogged this from smarterplanet
  15. kuwaitigenius reblogged this from smarterplanet
  16. tmiiwonkothesane reblogged this from smarterplanet
  17. telstarhk reblogged this from smarterplanet
  18. smarterplanet reblogged this from underpaidgenius
  19. sosungalittleclodofclay reblogged this from stoweboyd
  20. stoweboyd reblogged this from underpaidgenius
  21. underpaidgenius reblogged this from wildcat2030
  22. wildcat2030 posted this

← Previous Post Next Post →

About

Web anthropologist, futurist, author. My focus is the future, and the tectonic forces pushing business, media, and society into an unclear and accelerating future. more.

Working on longer format projects, Sign up for the newsletter.

GigaOM Research analyst and curator.

Also writing beaconstreets.com.

Contact me. or ask me a question.



My Vizify profile.

Socialogy

  • John Hagel | John offers up some great insights, like the fact that passion is lower the larger that businesses get.

  • Euan Semple | A chat with my old pal, and the author of Organizations Don't Tweet, People Do

  • Will McInnes | The author of Culture Shock and managing director of Nixon/McInnes

  • Jennifer Magnolfi | An interview with the woman who said, 'Work is not a place you go, it's a thing you do'.

    • Hot Now

  • What Drives Us? | A draft chapter of my book, discussing motivations, Maslow's hierarchy, and fluidarity.

  • Socialogy: Interview With John Hagel | I Speak with Joh Hagel about the innovation at the edge.

  • Complex organisation arises from webs of interaction among causal factors | So, it turns out that DNA is, in fact, a great metaphor for business culture, but only after you realize that DNA is not a few hundred off-on switches, but instead a universe of unknowable complexities, that we can interact with, and understand at some abstract cartoonish level, but not control, and never fully comprehend.

  • Bitcoin May Be the Global Economy’s Last Safe Haven | Paul Ford

  • Innovators Get Better With Age | Companies make a mistake by relying too much on the innoations of the young, because Nobel laureats don't come into their prime until their 50s.

    • Oldie

  • Infodemics | 2009 | Passing incomplete or inaccurate information about some risk event can make people take actions that increase the damage of the event itself.

    • Lynx theme created by Andrew Stichbury for Tumblr.