Install Theme
There is nothing to prevent Congress from passing laws which shall compel a man, who is accused or suspected of a crime, to furnish evidence against himself, and even from establishing laws which shall order the court to take the charge exhibited against a man for truth, unless he can furnish evidence of his innocence. I do not pretend to say Congress will do this; but, sir, I undertake to say that Congress (according to the powers proposed to be given them by the Constitution) may do it; and if they do not, it will be owing entirely — I repeat it, it will be owing entirely — to the goodness of the men, and not in the least degree owing to the goodness of the Constitution.

Abraham Holmes, 1778, during the Massachusetts ratifying convention, cited by Joe Wolverton II in Supreme Court Bombshell: No Right to Remain Silent

Blog comments powered by Disqus
  1. iycrmm reblogged this from stoweboyd
  2. bseverns reblogged this from stoweboyd
  3. principia-coh reblogged this from charnanigans
  4. tibywiby reblogged this from stoweboyd
  5. charnanigans reblogged this from thepete
  6. flightlessbirdcarelesswings reblogged this from stoweboyd
  7. thepete reblogged this from stoweboyd
  8. stoweboyd posted this