Day Desks: Coworking Goes Hotel

Coworking is a great model for footloose (and penurious) freelancers and small startups, who need places to work but don’t want or can’t afford the overhead of getting an office.

One issue is level of commitment: most coworking spaces are organized around a monthly agreement: so much for a full-time desk, so much for full time access to shared desks, so much for one day/week access, and so on. So, even though you just want to date all over town, the coworking spaces are still looking for a monogamous tenant.

I stumbled across two sites yesterday that take out the marriage aspect of coworking, and make it seem more like dating, or renting a hotel room: Desktime and OpenDesks.

These sites allow you to search for a desk to rent by the day, based on geography. 

In the case of Desktime, you can search for other features, like a shared printer or conference room.

Desktime is only available for use in Austin, Chicago, and New York, while Opendesk seems to be more agnostic.

I can imagine using these apps frequently, especially now that I opted out of the coworking space I had signed up for. I found that I was not actually using the space one day per week, as I had planned, and I travel all over New York for meetings. Now I will be able to track down space that is located near where I am going to be, like near to Grand Central Station, where my trains come and go.

I bet that the creation of sites like these will open up the untapped option of companies renting out desks who otherwise wouldn’t, becuase of the hassles involved. These new sites could act like AirBNB, getting companies to rent space on a casual basis, that they otherwise wouldn’t have.

A side note: Yesterday, I came across Third Door, a coworking site in London, that provides day care for freelancer’s kids. I haven’t heard of that in the US at all.

Why is that? Don’t coworking types have kids?

Desktime has a box I can check looking for ‘pet friendly’ spaces, but ‘kid friendly’ isn’t an option, I guess.

Notes

  1. stoweboyd posted this

← Previous Post Next Post →

About

Web anthropologist, futurist, author. My focus is the future, and the tectonic forces pushing business, media, and society into an unclear and accelerating future. (More.)

Working on longer format projects, Sign up for the newsletter.

GigaOM Research analyst and curator.



Also writing beaconstreets.com.

Contact me. or ask me a question.



My Vizify profile.

Socialogy

  • Brian Solis | Brian and I debunk big data, and Brian makes the case for empathy.

  • Deb Lavoy | Deb is dubious about management's inclinations, and says, 'Just because you are networked doesn’t mean it necessarily helps you understand, or realize your needs more effectively.'

  • John Hagel | John offers up some great insights, like the fact that passion is lower the larger that businesses get.

  • Euan Semple | A chat with my old pal, and the author of Organizations Don't Tweet, People Do

  • Will McInnes | The author of Culture Shock and managing director of Nixon/McInnes

  • Jennifer Magnolfi | An interview with the woman who said, 'Work is not a place you go, it's a thing you do'.

  • Hot Now

  • What Drives Us? | A draft chapter of my book, discussing motivations, Maslow's hierarchy, and fluidarity.

  • Socialogy: Interview With John Hagel | I Speak with Joh Hagel about the innovation at the edge.

  • Complex organisation arises from webs of interaction among causal factors | So, it turns out that DNA is, in fact, a great metaphor for business culture, but only after you realize that DNA is not a few hundred off-on switches, but instead a universe of unknowable complexities, that we can interact with, and understand at some abstract cartoonish level, but not control, and never fully comprehend.

  • Bitcoin May Be the Global Economy’s Last Safe Haven | Paul Ford

  • Innovators Get Better With Age | Companies make a mistake by relying too much on the innoations of the young, because Nobel laureats don't come into their prime until their 50s.

  • Oldie

  • Infodemics | 2009 | Passing incomplete or inaccurate information about some risk event can make people take actions that increase the damage of the event itself.