Ito’s Nine Principles

Michael Copeland of Wired interviewed Joi Ito of the MIT Media Lab, getting past the techno-utopianism and down to an almost Taoist set of principles for thriving in the postnormal world, a time of mounting uncertainty, ambiguity, complexity, and volatility. After chatting about the falling cost of innovation, and Schumpeterian disruptions in hardware, genetics, and healthcare we get down to the meat:

Michael Copeland, Resiliency, Risk, and a Good Compass: Tools for the Coming Chaos

Wired: And in the face of that we ought to do what?
Ito: What you need to do is understand these changes are happening, and build systems and governments and ways of thinking that are resilient to this kind of destructive change that is going to happen. It’s a kind of change that is really hard to predict, it’s really hard to control, so how do you as a human being, or as an organization, survive in this chaotic, unpredictable system where planning is almost impossible?

Wired: Please tell me you have an answer.
Ito: There are nine or so principles to work in a world like this:

  1. Resilience instead of strength, which means you want to yield and allow failure and you bounce back instead of trying to resist failure.
  2. You pull instead of push. That means you pull the resources from the network as you need them, as opposed to centrally stocking them and controlling them.
  3. You want to take risk instead of focusing on safety.
  4. You want to focus on the system instead of objects.
  5. You want to have good compasses not maps.
  6. You want to work on practice instead of theory. Because sometimes you don’t why it works, but what is important is that it is working, not that you have some theory around it.
  7. It[’s] disobedience instead of compliance. You don’t get a Nobel Prize for doing what you are told. Too much of school is about obedience, we should really be celebrating disobedience.
  8. It’s the crowd instead of experts.
  9. It’s a focus on learning instead of education.

We’re still working on it, but that is where our thinking is headed.

A few thoughts:

The ‘risk/safety’ dichotomy is also ‘be biased toward speculative experiments that allow deeper understanding of implications, rather than optimizing around lowering disruption and short-term costs’.

One thing missing is the principle related to resilience: ‘go slow to go fast’. This means you need to step out of the flow of today’s operational frenzy to take new actions. In martial arts, this means you must relax your muscles and nerves to respond or attack quickly.

You don’t get a Nobel Prize for doing what you are told’ is priceless.

(via brucesterling)

Source: brucesterling

Notes

  1. morethanoneway reblogged this from brucesterling
  2. valeuporisso reblogged this from brucesterling
  3. pseudomancer reblogged this from wilwheaton
  4. teaup reblogged this from stoweboyd
  5. g-uen reblogged this from andrewberg
  6. fatespectrum reblogged this from futuredandy
  7. littlesatyr reblogged this from wilwheaton
  8. shannonpatrick17 reblogged this from brucesterling
  9. thenextromana reblogged this from wilwheaton
  10. quillshiv reblogged this from brucesterling
  11. jenericalname reblogged this from wilwheaton
  12. jimihands reblogged this from asseenelsewhere
  13. timmyflynn reblogged this from brucesterling
  14. asseenelsewhere reblogged this from brucesterling
  15. magicmissileheadshot reblogged this from wilwheaton
  16. techgrok reblogged this from brucesterling
  17. regenschirmstoff reblogged this from bloctrl
  18. bloctrl reblogged this from hekj
  19. fuckyoukatherineheigl reblogged this from sadrobotinabowlerhat
  20. sadrobotinabowlerhat reblogged this from wilwheaton
  21. heytheresupes reblogged this from mistressofstickfigures
  22. autumnsong reblogged this from bloowind
  23. bloowind reblogged this from beingcalliope
  24. inexorablyacademic reblogged this from wilwheaton
  25. beingcalliope reblogged this from brucesterling
  26. matthewkrawse reblogged this from khuyi
  27. lilacs-bloom-in-may reblogged this from wilwheaton
  28. jandirafeijo reblogged this from stoweboyd
  29. anotando reblogged this from blat
  30. raito-taco reblogged this from wilwheaton

← Previous Post Next Post →

About

Web anthropologist, futurist, author. My focus is the future, and the tectonic forces pushing business, media, and society into an unclear and accelerating future. more.

Working on longer format projects, Sign up for the newsletter.

GigaOM Research analyst and curator.

Also writing beaconstreets.com.

Contact me. or ask me a question.



My Vizify profile.

Socialogy

  • John Hagel | John offers up some great insights, like the fact that passion is lower the larger that businesses get.

  • Euan Semple | A chat with my old pal, and the author of Organizations Don't Tweet, People Do

  • Will McInnes | The author of Culture Shock and managing director of Nixon/McInnes

  • Jennifer Magnolfi | An interview with the woman who said, 'Work is not a place you go, it's a thing you do'.

  • Hot Now

  • What Drives Us? | A draft chapter of my book, discussing motivations, Maslow's hierarchy, and fluidarity.

  • Socialogy: Interview With John Hagel | I Speak with Joh Hagel about the innovation at the edge.

  • Complex organisation arises from webs of interaction among causal factors | So, it turns out that DNA is, in fact, a great metaphor for business culture, but only after you realize that DNA is not a few hundred off-on switches, but instead a universe of unknowable complexities, that we can interact with, and understand at some abstract cartoonish level, but not control, and never fully comprehend.

  • Bitcoin May Be the Global Economy’s Last Safe Haven | Paul Ford

  • Innovators Get Better With Age | Companies make a mistake by relying too much on the innoations of the young, because Nobel laureats don't come into their prime until their 50s.

  • Oldie

  • Infodemics | 2009 | Passing incomplete or inaccurate information about some risk event can make people take actions that increase the damage of the event itself.