To obsess over the offline and deny all the ways we routinely remain disconnected is to fetishize this disconnection. Author after author pretends to be a lone voice, taking a courageous stand in support of the offline in precisely the moment it has proliferated and become over-valorized. For many, maintaining the fiction of the collective loss of the offline for everyone else is merely an attempt to construct their own personal time-outs as more special, as allowing them to rise above those social forces of distraction that have ensnared the masses. “I am real. I am the thoughtful human. You are the automaton.” I am reminded of a line from a recent essay by Sarah Nicole Prickett: that we are “so obsessed with the real that it’s unrealistic, atavistic, and just silly.” How have we come to make the error of collectively mourning the loss of that which is proliferating?The notion of the offline as real and authentic is a recent invention, corresponding with the rise of the online.
In great part, the reason is that we have been taught to mistakenly view online as meaning not offline. The notion of the offline as real and authentic is a recent invention, corresponding with the rise of the online. If we can fix this false separation and view the digital and physical as enmeshed, we will understand that what we do while connected is inseparable from what we do when disconnected. That is, disconnection from the smartphone and social media isn’t really disconnection at all: The logic of social media follows us long after we log out. There was and is no offline; it is a lusted-after fetish object that some claim special ability to attain, and it has always been a phantom.
Digital information has long been portrayed as an elsewhere, a new and different cyberspace, a tendency I have coined the term “digital dualism” to describe: the habit of viewing the online and offline as largely distinct. The common (mis)understanding is experience is zero-sum: time spent online means less spent offline. We are either jacked into the Matrix or not; we are either looking at our devices or not. When camping, I have service or not, and when out to eat, my friend is either texting or not. The smartphone has come to be “the perfect symbol” of leaving the here and now for something digital, some other, cyber, space.
But this idea that we are trading the offline for the online, though it dominates how we think of the digital and the physical, is myopic. It fails to capture the plain fact that our lived reality is the result of the constant interpenetration of the online and offline. That is, we live in an augmented reality that exists at the intersection of materiality and information, physicality and digitality, bodies and technology, atoms and bits, the off and the online. It is wrong to say “IRL” to mean offline: Facebook is real life.
Facebook doesn’t curtail the offline but depends on it. What is most crucial to our time spent logged on is what happened when logged off; it is the fuel that runs the engine of social media. The photos posted, the opinions expressed, the check-ins that fill our streams are often anchored by what happens when disconnected and logged-off. The Web has everything to do with reality; it comprises real people with real bodies, histories, and politics. It is the fetish objects of the offline and the disconnected that are not real.
Nathan Jurgenson, The IRL Fetish via The New Inquiry
- shoreofmysoul likes this
- new-sensations reblogged this from adhocratic
- reddysteadygo reblogged this from emergentfutures
- adamjgmiller likes this
- tldr likes this
- lesshumansmorecats reblogged this from tal9000
- boscothemigh likes this
- danicar likes this
- notevensurewhy reblogged this from antistigma
- worsethandetroit likes this
- savantesyndrome reblogged this from adhocratic
- adhocratic reblogged this from underpaidgenius
- pamuela64 likes this
- zeebestthingsinlife likes this
- eldritchroad likes this
- atransparenteyeball reblogged this from stoweboyd
- petersantiago likes this
- silicondigest reblogged this from emergentfutures
- onpointchicago likes this
- crazeddesignlife reblogged this from emergentfutures
- complexitea reblogged this from emergentfutures
- greenishenvy likes this
- the-city-mouse reblogged this from paradife-loft
- amirrorforone likes this
- greggyour reblogged this from emergentfutures
- que-eseso reblogged this from emergentfutures
- que-eseso likes this
- veliseraptor likes this
- rokaccia reblogged this from emergentfutures
- rokaccia likes this
- paradife-loft reblogged this from tal9000
- opir likes this
- harmalade likes this
- tomorrowold reblogged this from emergentfutures
- ofletters reblogged this from emergentfutures
- blahblashdkflsahl likes this
- jeffcarp reblogged this from emergentfutures
- jeffcarp likes this
- bree-black reblogged this from alisonofagun
- willreadbooksformoney likes this
- chazspalace reblogged this from emergentfutures
- chazspalace likes this
- claragabrielle likes this
- lustermuse reblogged this from lordofkobol
- girlwithalessonplan likes this
- dickensian-werewolf likes this
- kinigget reblogged this from tal9000
- qknc likes this
- palimpsestghost likes this
- lordofkobol reblogged this from antistigma
Web anthropologist, futurist, author. My focus is the future, and the tectonic forces pushing business, media, and society into an unclear and accelerating future. more.
Working on longer format projects, Sign up for the newsletter.
GigaOM Research analyst and curator.
Also writing beaconstreets.com.
Contact me. or ask me a question.
My Vizify profile.