TV networks’ dominance of the delivery of TV content is rapidly collapsing, as alternatives expand and people build up their libraries:
Primetime Mystery: Where Did All the TV Viewers Go? - Derek Thompson via The Atlantic
The networks’ share of primetime TV audience (dark blue in the graph below [above in this post]) has declined from 45% in 1985 to 25% in 2009. Basic cable ate the networks’
lunchpost-dinner audience, and now it’s technology’s turn gobble up what’s left.Even with this long trend line (and despite the fact that viewers often unplug in the spring), there is a sense that we’ve reached a tipping point thanks to what Gaspin calls “built-up libraries.” There is more good stuff to watch not-on-live-TV than on live-TV, and even the head of entertainment at NBC knows it. Television technologies are dragging us away from live television, to a world of smaller screens, shifting “windows,” and no more ads. In 2000, a company called Netflix was experimenting with movie rentals. Now they have more than 20 million streaming customers. In 2005, about 1% of households owned DVRs. Today, it’s more than 40%. In 2006, Hulu didn’t exist. Today it has just under 30 million monthly uniques, with more than 1 million paying subscribers. In 2009, there were no iPads. Today, there are 60 million, and most of them are in the United States. That’s a Cambrian explosion of options for “watching TV” without literally watching an actual TV.
So people are ‘watching TV’ but not watching network programming in real time: they have defected from the ‘appointment TV’ model, or defected from broadcast and networks as the delivery mechanism for TV media.
PS DVR is a strange intermediary technology, one that foreshadowed keeping your TV shows in the cloud. (Apple’s iTunes in the cloud is poised to destroy the market for DVR devices.)
(h/t emergent futures)
Notes
-
journo-geekery reblogged this from stoweboyd
-
ivesy likes this
-
obliterated1 reblogged this from stoweboyd and added:
Ah that’s what I like - a graph that so clear you have to explain it in the first par of the accompanying copy….FFS...
-
dragoni likes this
-
sosungalittleclodofclay likes this
-
sosungalittleclodofclay reblogged this from stoweboyd
-
jackyan reblogged this from stoweboyd and added:
The end of network TV This hardly surprises me, especially as someone who listens to more radio per week than watches...
-
kenyatta likes this
-
futuresagency reblogged this from stoweboyd and added:
TV networks’ dominance of the delivery of TV content is rapidly collapsing, as alternatives expand and people build up...
-
stoweboyd posted this
About
Web anthropologist, futurist, author. My focus is the future, and the tectonic forces pushing business, media, and society into an unclear and accelerating future. more.
Working on longer format projects, Sign up for the newsletter.
GigaOM Research analyst and curator.
Also writing beaconstreets.com.
Contact me. or ask me a question.

My Vizify profile.
Socialogy
Hot Now
Oldie
Likes
-
-
It was unusual to see Neil Gaiman and Bruce Sterling piling on to the same cover real-estate
-
Once Yahoo! forces integration of Tumblr and Yahoo! logins I’ll deactivate.
-
-
A storage power plant on the seabed
Norwegian research scientists will contribute to realising the concept of storing...
-
“DELIVERY workers tramp through tunnels under Gaza — carrying bags and buckets of Kentucky Fried Chicken.
The famous fast food has...
-

![TV networks’ dominance of the delivery of TV content is rapidly collapsing, as alternatives expand and people build up their libraries:
Primetime Mystery: Where Did All the TV Viewers Go? - Derek Thompson via The Atlantic
The networks’ share of primetime TV audience (dark blue in the graph below [above in this post]) has declined from 45% in 1985 to 25% in 2009. Basic cable ate the networks’ lunch post-dinner audience, and now it’s technology’s turn gobble up what’s left.
Even with this long trend line (and despite the fact that viewers often unplug in the spring), there is a sense that we’ve reached a tipping point thanks to what Gaspin calls “built-up libraries.” There is more good stuff to watch not-on-live-TV than on live-TV, and even the head of entertainment at NBC knows it. Television technologies are dragging us away from live television, to a world of smaller screens, shifting “windows,” and no more ads. In 2000, a company called Netflix was experimenting with movie rentals. Now they have more than 20 million streaming customers. In 2005, about 1% of households owned DVRs. Today, it’s more than 40%. In 2006, Hulu didn’t exist. Today it has just under 30 million monthly uniques, with more than 1 million paying subscribers. In 2009, there were no iPads. Today, there are 60 million, and most of them are in the United States. That’s a Cambrian explosion of options for “watching TV” without literally watching an actual TV.
So people are ‘watching TV’ but not watching network programming in real time: they have defected from the ‘appointment TV’ model, or defected from broadcast and networks as the delivery mechanism for TV media.
PS DVR is a strange intermediary technology, one that foreshadowed keeping your TV shows in the cloud. (Apple’s iTunes in the cloud is poised to destroy the market for DVR devices.)
(h/t emergent futures)](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3509nPzOP1qcz5rmo1_500.gif)