Graph Rank: Just Another Proof That Facebook Should Be Boycotted

A former CTO was briefed on ‘Facebook’s advertising strategy’ (although it’s not clear by who) and suggest that they are up to no good:

Anonymous via Betabeat

If you logged onto Facebook yesterday, perhaps you caught a link at the top of the News Feed that read: “About Ads: Ever wonder how Facebook makes money? Get the details.” The answers provided some context on the news that starting in January, Facebook will start integrating a type of ad, called “sponsored stories,” that display your friends faces next to content they have “liked” in larger-sized ads your News Feed mix. “Facebook makes its money from showing you ads,” the company told consumers yesterday and with the ramp up to its spring 2012 IPO, the social network is getting serious about that endeavor.

In what seemed like an unrelated move, in September, Facebook announced a brand new type of profile called Timeline, where your whole personal history is laid out by month-by-month, all the way back to your birth. At the time, Facebook described it to consumers as a chance to: “Share and highlight your most memorable posts, photos and life events on your timeline. This is where you can tell your story from beginning, to middle, to now.” By the end of this year all 800 million plus Facebook profiles will have been converted to this new interface.

What most users don’t know is that the new features being introduced are all centered around increasing the value of Facebook to advertisers, to the point where Facebook representatives have been selling the idea that Timeline is actually about re-conceptualizing users around their consumer preferences, or as they put it, “brands are now an essential part of people’s identities.” 

The name itself is cleverly designed to conceal the fact that your profile no longer arranges information chronologically. Yes, things are laid out by year and by month. But, when it comes to what’s displayed to your social circle at any given time, other metrics, including direct payments to Facebook itself, will now influence the ranking and placement of stories. This payola will be a crucial part of the graph rank, the new metric for placement that the social network uses to determine what appears on your profile.

“Graph Rank” is a complex and non-published algorithm, but we know direct payments to Facebook and app/user popularity are important parts of the ranking. The newest thing is no longer on top. There is a rough month-by-month sort, but within the month it’s graph rank, not chronological order, that determines placement.

So, Facebook is selling our memories — outr timeline — to advertisers. When users scroll back in their timeline the weighting of what was most important to us back in December 2011, say, will be based on advertising dollars, not something intrinsic to our lives, or the social weighting of the interactions we had with friends. 

Everyone should simply stop using Facebook. It’s been obvious for years that they could care less about it: we are an ore that they are mining for money. We are not people to them, except to the extent that our human qualities provide a way to exploit us.

Source: betabeat.com

Notes

  1. meilleure-carte-graphique-2012 reblogged this from stoweboyd
  2. upcoming-blackberry-phones-2012 reblogged this from stoweboyd
  3. berbaquero reblogged this from stoweboyd
  4. w8forthedrop reblogged this from stoweboyd
  5. acckkii reblogged this from stoweboyd
  6. theslovenskiobservatory reblogged this from stoweboyd
  7. osamu2001 reblogged this from stoweboyd
  8. dennysantoso reblogged this from stoweboyd
  9. seymourbuhts reblogged this from stoweboyd
  10. nothingandeverythingwat reblogged this from stoweboyd
  11. iatemycrusts reblogged this from stoweboyd
  12. greenspah reblogged this from stoweboyd
  13. emergentdigitalpractices reblogged this from stoweboyd
  14. jerrygrundman reblogged this from stoweboyd and added:
    Some people who have been using...earn income by selling its audience
  15. ahandsomestark reblogged this from stoweboyd
  16. sykelifeisawesome reblogged this from stoweboyd and added:
    I’m pretty close to doing so.
  17. ihateyouallequally reblogged this from stoweboyd and added:
    Mark ‘Goebbels’ Zuckerberg.
  18. yashintaholic reblogged this from stoweboyd
  19. catvincent reblogged this from stoweboyd
  20. This was featured in #Tech
  21. sexandaudio said: yes, youre right. facebook is selling our info to advertisers. but that is no reason to stop using facebook. they only say that “brands are now an essential part of people’s identities.” because its true. the only reason we have jobs is to buy stuff.
  22. stoweboyd posted this

← Previous Post Next Post →

About

Web anthropologist, futurist, author. My focus is the future, and the tectonic forces pushing business, media, and society into an unclear and accelerating future. more.

Working on longer format projects, Sign up for the newsletter.

GigaOM Research analyst and curator.

Also writing beaconstreets.com.

Contact me. or ask me a question.



My Vizify profile.

Socialogy

  • John Hagel | John offers up some great insights, like the fact that passion is lower the larger that businesses get.

  • Euan Semple | A chat with my old pal, and the author of Organizations Don't Tweet, People Do

  • Will McInnes | The author of Culture Shock and managing director of Nixon/McInnes

  • Jennifer Magnolfi | An interview with the woman who said, 'Work is not a place you go, it's a thing you do'.

  • Hot Now

  • What Drives Us? | A draft chapter of my book, discussing motivations, Maslow's hierarchy, and fluidarity.

  • Socialogy: Interview With John Hagel | I Speak with Joh Hagel about the innovation at the edge.

  • Complex organisation arises from webs of interaction among causal factors | So, it turns out that DNA is, in fact, a great metaphor for business culture, but only after you realize that DNA is not a few hundred off-on switches, but instead a universe of unknowable complexities, that we can interact with, and understand at some abstract cartoonish level, but not control, and never fully comprehend.

  • Bitcoin May Be the Global Economy’s Last Safe Haven | Paul Ford

  • Innovators Get Better With Age | Companies make a mistake by relying too much on the innoations of the young, because Nobel laureats don't come into their prime until their 50s.

  • Oldie

  • Infodemics | 2009 | Passing incomplete or inaccurate information about some risk event can make people take actions that increase the damage of the event itself.